This page may contain affiliate links that pay me a small commission. There is no cost to you. You can review the affiliate statement at the very bottom of this page if you want more information. As an Amazon affiliate Canon Camera Geek may earn a small commission from qualifying purchases, at NO added cost to you.
by Huzefa Zoeb
(Sri Lanka)
Hey,
So i have done photography alot in other cameras and now i'm planning on purchasing my own one...but im very confused with these two choices...
I Need this camera to cover Portraits to Sports to Weddings...basically everything...
What would you recommend me...
90D is latest, better processor,more ISO Range...faster shutter speeds...latest tech....inbuilt flash...BUT THE ONLY ISSUE IS THAT IT IS A CROP SENSOR
where as the Canon 6d Mark ii is older and the old processor but still it is full frame which can give better quality and better low light images....
im very confused on what to go with...it will be really helpful if you could evaluate it in detail...and help me with the choice...
Thank you
Hi Huzefa, thanks for your question comparing the Canon 6D Mark II with the 90D. I chose a 90D for 3 main reasons, but I think the 6D Mark II may be better for you based on all the points you made in your initial question.
It's challenging when comparing an APS-C crop camera versus a full frame. There are subtle differences like the different levels of bokeh (important for shooting portraits) and size of the pixels (important factor for noise) squeezed onto the sensor.
Bruce Lovelace is the publisher of Canon Camera Geek. Read more about him on the About Page. He also publishes how to articles and camera gear reviews at the Photography Tips website.
View some of Bruce's photos on Instagram and Flickr. Join the tribe of followers on YouTube. Bruce also runs photo workshops and provides 1 on 1 digital photography coaching.
Dec 14, 24 03:13 PM
Dec 14, 24 01:16 PM
Dec 14, 24 10:03 AM
Dec 13, 24 02:39 PM
Dec 13, 24 08:38 AM